They were the children of Luke Noble Usher, an actor who performed with and was a close friend of Poe's actress mother, Eliza Poe. Edgar Allan Poe left the University of Virginia because he didn? Because of this, Poe ran up many debts, which he disastrously tried to pay off by gambling. As a result, he had to leave the university after only about one year. Edgar Allan Poe was an American writer, poet, critic and editor best known for evocative short stories and poems that captured the imagination and interest of readers around the world.
His imaginative storytelling and tales of mystery and horror gave birth to the modern detective story. Did Edgar Allan Poe kill anybody? The death of Edgar Allan Poe on October 7, , has remained mysterious. The circumstances leading up to it are uncertain, and the cause of death is disputed. What genre did Poe create? What was Poe's favorite literary form? Today, Poe is recognized as one of the foremost progenitors of modern literature, both in its popular forms, such as horror and detective fiction, and in its more complex and self-conscious forms, which represent the essential artistic manner of the 20th century.
There was no advertising income. The alienation of even a hundred subscribers would be disastrous. Then, too, there was the problem of obtaining material worth publishing. One way was to set up an exchange with other magazines in other parts of the country.
This amounted to a reprint-without-pay privilege. It could be done because most magazines of the day circulated only in their own regions. With all of these considerations on his mind, he was appalled at the temerity of his young assistant, who was deliberately provoking hostility from the very New York editors that should have been cultivated.
He hoped the blunder would pass unnoticed, but such did not turn out to be the case. Poe made enemies with the Norman Leslie review, enemies who plagued him for the rest of his career. It was humorous, Tucker admitted in a letter to Poe, but he thought book reviews should be dignified in tone. Poe wrote to Tucker in answer to this criticism, citing the example of such famous British reviewers as Lord Jeffrey and Christopher North and claiming that a critic weakened his authority by treating a worthless book seriously.
Instead of fame, he gained instant notoriety. It would appear that Poe would have received sufficient warning by the reaction to this incident. Another man might have given in to the pressure and adopted the practice of most American reviewers, bestowing praise where it would to the most good, and avoiding censure wherever it might cause trouble. Literary logrolling and back-scratching were the order of the day in America, except in a few cases of regional rivalries or when some author, like poor Fenimore Cooper, aroused collective animosity by daring to criticize his native land.
Poe, however, felt confident that he could demonstrate the validity of his judgments, even when he condemned a popular author. In the very next number of the Southern Literary Messenger January, he reviewed a book of poems by Mrs.
Lydia Huntley Sigourney, the sweet singer of Connecticut. According to E. Sigourney would be like insulting the memory of George Washington: one did it at his own risk.
Furthermore, Mrs. Sigourney was a contributor to the Messenger. Everything called for tact in handling this book of poems, but young Poe, beginning to feel that literary standards were worth fighting for, regretfully proclaimed that Mrs. In fact, Poe suggested, she had been manipulated into recognition by shrewd public relations whereas she really was nothing more than an imitator of the leading female poet of England, Mrs.
Felicia Hemans. The fat was in the fire. Poe had not made fun of Mrs. His tone was serious and thoughtful, but his charge was clear: a second-rate, imitative poet was enjoying an undeserved reputation. Publisher White was scandalized.
He did so, quite generously, and Mrs. Sigourney was mollified. Few critics in America would have been capable of doing the same at this time, for these principles were generally considered too difficult and abstruse for application. Simms, from the literary center of Charleston, South Carolina, was by far the most prolific writer in the South, and it was the avowed editorial policy of the Southern Literary Messenger to encourage Southern writing.
Furthermore, it required little effort of the imagination to see that Simms could do the Messenger a great deal of good as a friend, contributor, and journalistic colleague. He concluded that Simms ought to take up landscape painting, for perhaps he could draw pictures better than he could write. Yet these few months of professional reviewing were an educational experience for Edgar Poe.
He was learning, among other things, that a literary critic in a country without a well-established literature must teach the public to recognize good writing instead of ridiculing bad writing off the market. He must show the public why a given work was good or bad, which meant that not only must he locate the faults of a composition but also he must demonstrate that faults really were faults when judged objectively by sound rhetorical principles.
A responsible critic, Poe found, must educate the public taste. Ex cathedra pronouncements convinced no one of anything except the bad manners of the critic. First of all, Poe made it clear in his review that he was concerned with the state of American literature in general, not merely a few mediocre books.
He announced that as an editor he was going to exert all of his influence to abolish the pernicious habit of praising every work written in America. Finally, after having proclaimed that his tactics were in the interest of the literary health of America, Poe proceeded to demonstrate that he was indeed able to review a book without ridiculing either the author or the book itself.
He showed that he could judge the poems of Drake and Halleck according to the highest literary principles. A model of philosophical criticism already existed in the method of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Poetry fulfilled this purpose only when it was imaginative enough to suggest ideal beauty — beauty over and beyond ordinary perception. Poe even rewrote several passages from Drake to prove that it was no great trick to compose verses of this low quality.
Poe achieved a certain maturity in this review. Not only did he set forth aesthetic principles, but also he analyzed particular passages and used the comparative method to reinforce his argument.
No longer was he extorting laughs at the expense of poor-devil authors; instead he signalled his intention to praise or condemn according to an objective method of evaluation. It would be gratifying to say that Poe always remained at this high level, but such is not the case.
Poe was human. He had his crotchets, his prejudices, and all too often he indulged them. For one thing, he could not tolerate bad grammar. It was a characteristic of the romantic period to place a high value on originality, and none placed a higher value on it than Poe. Some of his troubles in later years came from his ill-advised condemnation of other writers as imitators or plagiarists.
Then, too, Poe was extremely sensitive. But what else was in that issue? What was Poe like as an editor? And how did he choose to contextualize one of his most famous stories? There are anxious dandy men and vulnerable waifish women. Some contributions serve as tributes to perceived heroes, others as takedowns of rude morons. The passage seems like more of a strategic entry than anything else; writers and editors of the time commonly traded compliments and barbs within the pages of their respective publications.
The storytelling is lush and action-packed, providing a slice of mid th- century romanticism in the spirit of a writer like Herman Melville. They retaliate upon others the mortal blows which they have received.
They not only seduce. He began to publish more short stories and in landed an editorial position with the Southern Literary Messenger in Richmond. Poe developed a reputation as a cut-throat critic, writing vicious reviews of his contemporaries. His scathing critiques earned him the nickname the "Tomahawk Man. His tenure at the magazine proved short. Poe's aggressive-reviewing style and sometimes combative personality strained his relationship with the publication, and he left the magazine in His problems with alcohol also played a role in his departure, according to some reports.
In , Poe moved to New York City. There, he published a news story in The New York Sun about a balloon trip across the Atlantic Ocean that he later revealed to be a hoax.
His stunt grabbed attention, but it was his publication of "The Raven," in , which made Poe a literary sensation. That same year, Poe found himself under attack for his stinging criticisms of fellow poet Henry Wadsworth Longfellow. Poe claimed that Longfellow, a widely popular literary figure, was a plagiarist, which resulted in a backlash against Poe. Despite his success and popularity as a writer, Poe continued to struggle financially and he advocated for higher wages for writers and an international copyright law.
From to , Poe lived in Baltimore, where his father was born, with his aunt Maria Clemm and her daughter, his cousin Virginia. He began to devote his attention to Virginia, who became his literary inspiration as well as his love interest.
The couple married in when she was only 13 years old. Poe was overcome by grief following her death, and although he continued to work, he suffered from poor health and struggled financially until his death in Poe self-published his first book, Tamerlane and Other Poems , in As a critic at the Southern Literary Messenger in Richmond from to , Poe published some of his own works in the magazine, including two parts of his only novel, The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym.
0コメント